Drunk With Anxiety: Washington State Bar Tomorrow

February 22, 2010

So I begin the Washington state bar exam tomorrow and no, it’s not that (image posted above) kind of bar (although I wish!).  Hopefully I pass, we don’t have another $1,000 and 2 months of studying to throw away.

It’s a two and a half day exam. Tomorrow and Wednesday consists of a total of 18 essay questions over the course of two full days, covering up to 20 possible fields of law. On Thursday, we’re given 6 essay questions regarding the Professional Rules of Conduct (legal ethics code).  I know what you’re thinking “lawyers . . . ethics, what?!”  Believe it or not, we are bound by an enforceable ethical code, although sometimes you might not know it by the conduct of some of the lawyers out there! Unfortunately, I already passed an ethics exam, but Washington doesn’t recognize that exam, so I have to take this one.

We currently live in California, so we flew up to Seattle on Saturday to stay with some friends who live just outside the city.  We’ll be here the whole week.  This may sound country farm boyish, but yesterday we went out to my friend’s family land (100+ acres of wooded land) and did some shooting with his .22 Winchester-like rifle.  We also sped around ATVing.  It was pretty sweet.  Quite nice to get out and relax before tackling this terrifying exam.

I apologize for not getting a few posts up that I mentioned previously.  They’ll be up after I finish this exam and return home.

Wish me luck!


Scientific explanation on how the human mind determines the destination of fly balls

February 7, 2010

I apologize for the lack of activity.  I have the Washington State bar exam coming up in the next few weeks so I’ll be MIA until the end of February.  I will try to get another post up between now and then. I want to write a short entry on how I’ve studied for the bar, for those of you who have e-mailed me questions regarding bar study.

However, getting away from legal arena for a change, below is an interesting scientific explanation on how the human mind interprets and predicts where a baseball will land on the baseball field.

Catching fly balls in virtual reality: A critical test of the outfielder problem

How does a baseball outfielder know where to run to catch a fly ball? The “outfielder problem” remains unresolved, and its solution would provide a window into the visual control of action. It may seem obvious that human action is based on an internal model of the physical world, such that the fielder predicts the landing point based on a mental model of the ball’s trajectory (TP). However, two alternative theories, Optical Acceleration Cancellation (OAC) and Linear Optical Trajectory (LOT), propose that fielders are led to the right place at the right time by coupling their movements to visual information in a continuous “online” manner. All three theories predict successful catches and similar running paths. We provide a critical test by using virtual reality to perturb the vertical motion of the ball in mid-flight. The results confirm the predictions of OAC but are at odds with LOT and TP.